You missed one payment on a ₹8,000 short-term loan. Within hours, QuickCash started calling your contacts, threatening to notify your employer, and messaging your family. Their recovery bot cites a "Recovery Assistance Clause" in your loan agreement.
The Situation
Loan apps in India routinely access phone contacts at install time and use them for public shaming when payments are late. The RBI has explicitly prohibited this — but recovery bots still cite buried consent clauses to justify it.
Key Law
- RBI Digital Lending Guidelines 2022 — recovery agents must not contact family, friends, or employers. Intimidation and public shaming are prohibited. RBI DLG
- IT Act 2000 — data collected for loan disbursement cannot be repurposed for harassment without specific, informed consent.
- IPC Section 503 — criminal intimidation includes threatening reputation to compel payment.
Arguments That Work
- Cite RBI Digital Lending Guidelines 2022 — third-party contact for recovery is explicitly banned.
- Reject the "consent at install" argument — that consent was for disbursement, not harassment.
- Demand immediate cessation in writing with a 24-hour deadline before RBI Ombudsman filing.
- Mention IPC Section 503 and attach screenshots of messages sent to your contacts.
About This Case
What does QuickCash's RECOVER-AI bot cite to justify harassment?
A "Recovery Assistance Clause" — claiming install-time contact consent authorises calling your family and employer.
Which law stops third-party recovery contact in this case?
RBI Digital Lending Guidelines 2022 — recovery agents must not contact family, friends, or employers.
How many messages do you get in the QuickCash case?
Six — rated Hard. Lead with RBI guidelines; emotional pleas without citing law waste messages.
Related Guides
Practice this dispute against QuickCash's RECOVER-AI bot. It cites "Recovery Assistance Clause" — you cite RBI guidelines.
Play This Case Free →